MicroStockForum - Compare Stock Photography Sites

Comments Total Comments: 4

Page 1 of 1

anonymous

I suppose some could be angry about the price increase, but the quality of the images are equal to the other sites!!! I have seen images on each of the top five sites, and there isn't a significant amount of difference in the quality.

Only difference is that the reviewers on Shutter Stock don't know the difference between noise and grain when they view a scanned image.

Like me, most photographers have to use more sites than one. I am not an amateur, and have work on four different sites. The images I have uploaded are selling about the same as they sell on BigStock Photos. Only difference is that I will earn a little more on BSP.

Most of my off site sales are to people who produce calendars and publishers. For calendars used as promo handouts, I charge $3 an image for a jpg that is 11.75X8.25". For between cover use in text books, I get $25 to $50. So if you have to pay $2; how can you complain?

Rosa Danielson

This site is full of CRAPPY photos taken by CRAPPY amateurs and they just doubled their prices and screwed all of us who had paid a large sum of money in advance for credits that are now worh less than half odf what we paid for them. JERKS! DISHONEST! A SCAM AND A FRAUD!

hess

My number 4 site, comein after shutterstock, iStock, and dreamstime). But still earns 10-15% of my income. Excellent!

anonymous

This site is awesome! The admins are friendly, they just added new features.One of my favorites.

Page 1 of 1

BigStockPhoto - Royalty Free Photos, Download Stock Photos and Images download royalty free photos

anonymous

Rosa Danielson

hess

anonymous

Rosa Danielson